<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Class-Action on IT News</title>
    <link>https://it-news.uk/tags/class-action/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Class-Action on IT News</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://it-news.uk/tags/class-action/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Judge Dismisses Most Claims in AirPods Max Condensation Class Action</title>
      <link>https://it-news.uk/posts/airpods-max-condensation-lawsuit-dismissed/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://it-news.uk/posts/airpods-max-condensation-lawsuit-dismissed/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AirPods Max have a condensation problem. A handful of users have complained about moisture building up inside the over-ear headphones since they launched — enough that someone turned it into a class action lawsuit. But that lawsuit just hit a serious wall.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Judge Orelia Merchant of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed the vast majority of claims in a 24-page ruling, according to legal outlet Law360. The central question was straightforward: does condensation inside AirPods Max count as a defect, or is it just physics?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
